A high-profile FCA enforcement action against a major U.K. financial institution clarifies the standards now expected of AML monitoring, escalation, and remediation procedures. The findings provide useful read-across for U.S., U.K., and EU financial institutions revisiting their own AML programmes.
Key themes: senior-management knowledge of identified deficiencies without remediation; transaction-monitoring rule sets that materially under-detected expected typologies; insufficient escalation pathways for complex customer reviews. Each represents a fact pattern that examiners on both sides of the Atlantic increasingly probe in routine examinations.
Authors